Flock ALPR cameras
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 25, 2026.
Public comments (9)
The Aurora security analyst sarcastically argued the license plate readers track everyone's movements and make Brookings a place he doesn't want to shop or work.
City Council — August 25, 2026 · 2:22 →A Brookings resident and citizen group member presented months of sourced documentation alleging Flock broke promises, blaming no council members personally.
City Council — August 25, 2026 · 4:36 →The Aurora cybersecurity analyst explained how Flock cameras log every vehicle's details into a searchable shared database and asked for a council study session.
City Council — August 25, 2026 · 7:42 →She rebutted pro-Flock arguments, saying the 'vehicle fingerprint' system is far more than a plate reader and citing court precedent on aggregated tracking.
City Council — August 25, 2026 · 10:18 →The CLEAR chair said the cameras have value but asked the council and police to hold a study session and adopt policies on oversight, retention, and access.
City Council — August 25, 2026 · 13:36 →He detailed four Flock promises — data ownership, no selling data, 30-day retention, local control — saying all were broken when Flock rewrote terms on February 16, 2026.
City Council — August 25, 2026 · 15:21 →He walked through the contract language showing Flock's data license went from limited to perpetual and irrevocable, with the no-sale promise deleted and disputes moved to Georgia arbitration.
City Council — August 25, 2026 · 18:35 →The new Brookings homeowner summarized the group's requests: don't renew the contract, pass a moratorium on ALPRs and surveillance cameras, and hold a study session.
City Council — August 25, 2026 · 21:45 →He stated his strong opposition to the ALPRs, echoing earlier speakers.
City Council — August 25, 2026 · 24:11 →