South Dakota Record
Spearfish
Zoning

Chapter 154 subdivision revisions

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (2)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Apr 7, 2026.

Public comments (3)

OpposedBrad LimboApr 7, 2026

Said the 8-acre minimum would eliminate one-acre lots with city water and septic, and worried his own approved preliminary plat wouldn't meet the new rules — also objected to plats being forced to 'comply' with the comprehensive plan.

Planning Commission - Apr 7, 2026 · 1:14:08 →
ConcernedRandy DaibertApr 7, 2026

A veteran surveyor said some changes go beyond the engineering design standards, flagged missing review timelines and the comprehensive-plan 'shall comply' language, and urged continuing to the next meeting.

Planning Commission - Apr 7, 2026 · 1:21:31 →
OpposedJoe JorgensenApr 7, 2026

Argued the subdivision code and engineering design standards should be adopted together, objected to master plans becoming binding requirements, and said killing the one-acre-with-city-water option would stop his planned Rainbow Road project.

Planning Commission - Apr 7, 2026 · 1:30:02 →