Highway 85 North annexation
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Highway 85 North annexation area development→At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.
Public comments (4)
Jorgensen argued applicants shouldn't be barred from offering new information when responding to questions, then gave a detailed history of the Highway 85 North annexations — including his family's 300-acre holdings and the Meyers, Ward, Gunderson, and Utke annexations — and raised concerns about Belle Fourche's no-septic zone boundary and differing soil and water conditions east of the creek.
Planning Commission - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:43:00 →Spring Creek Ranch co-owner said Option 2 (rural standards) makes sense — curb, gutter, and city water for a few 40-acre tracts just isn't feasible.
City Council - May 27, 2026 · 1:32:07 →Two Bar Key Ranch owns 80 acres in the annexation area and 300 acres to the south; supported the flexibility Option 2 would provide.
City Council - May 27, 2026 · 1:34:41 →Owns a 46-acre highway-commercial parcel; said developers have waited years due to the agreement's stipulations and hopes things have now changed.
City Council - May 27, 2026 · 1:36:00 →