South Dakota Record
Spearfish
Development

Highway 85 North annexation

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.

Public comments (4)

MixedJoe JorgensenJun 16, 2026

Jorgensen argued applicants shouldn't be barred from offering new information when responding to questions, then gave a detailed history of the Highway 85 North annexations — including his family's 300-acre holdings and the Meyers, Ward, Gunderson, and Utke annexations — and raised concerns about Belle Fourche's no-septic zone boundary and differing soil and water conditions east of the creek.

Planning Commission - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:43:00 →
SupportiveRick FurnishMay 27, 2026

Spring Creek Ranch co-owner said Option 2 (rural standards) makes sense — curb, gutter, and city water for a few 40-acre tracts just isn't feasible.

City Council - May 27, 2026 · 1:32:07 →
SupportiveJoe JorgensenMay 27, 2026

Two Bar Key Ranch owns 80 acres in the annexation area and 300 acres to the south; supported the flexibility Option 2 would provide.

City Council - May 27, 2026 · 1:34:41 →
SupportiveAlan CragoMay 27, 2026

Owns a 46-acre highway-commercial parcel; said developers have waited years due to the agreement's stipulations and hopes things have now changed.

City Council - May 27, 2026 · 1:36:00 →